evolution

I wish natural selection did a better job at evolving human emotion.

as it is, we're pretty fucked up. thumbs are pretty cool, and our brains are interesting, but seriously, evolution didn't do too well with emotions. the highest times don't last quite as long as the lowest times, and they're never at quite an extreme either.

but, i suppose, natural selection isn't actively selecting genes, the genes are selected through their viability in their inhabiting body within the group. that's what natural selection is all about. and a part of this is probably that emotions don't matter to reproduction, so it's really not something that necessarily benefits or detriments genetic replication. I suppose that's a good argument against the pseudo-scientific claims of new-age nonsense like 'indigo children'.

Not to long ago I went to a Safeway in town when I noticed a small sticker on the light post that said God isn't real. That got me to thinking, I can scientifically prove God. You see the people that don't think God is real believe in evolution. But evolution fails to fully account for the world around us. Random changes in a life form can not explain why the world works the way it does. Evolution can explain a butterfly or sunflower very neatly indeed. But evolution can not explain cancer AIDS murder Famine genocide or why the world is full of so much pain. To explain that we need a designer, a malevolent designer, one who fashioned the world with pain for his entertainment. And oddly enough the Christian God fits that bill to a T. If you don't entertain him by worshiping him good enough he'll give you cancer. I know what your thinking this isn't science it's just some nut job on the internet scribbling out some insane idea. Well you haven't let me finish yet, to prove God scientifically I'll call my idea The Theory of Malevolent Design. Now that's real science. I'm sure my new theory will replace evolution in all American schools in the next five years. I should get my Nobel Prize shortly after that.